Does anyone know (or feel) whether the music used in these mp3s and YouYube videos is tuned to 432 Hz or 440 Hz? It is said that 432 Hz is more harmonious and organic, while 440 Hz is not. I understand that they “royalty free music”. Thanks!
They don’t contain frequency in the music. Just what i install in them.
The background music you use contains no frequencies?
I understand that you program the audios (or music) with neutral energies. My question is about the tuning method of the background music you use and whether they are tuned to 432 Hz or 440 Hz.
In “standard/Western” tuning (equal temperament), the reference pitch is A4 = 440 Hz; but 432 Hz tuning is believed to have more harmonious and natural qualities.
When we listen to your mp3s or watch your YouTube videos, we can be affected by both the background music AND the energy fields you have installed.
Please clarify. Thanks!
The music is all is 440hz. Personally I don’t recommend using music in 432hz. I know some people find it calming and I understand the background behind it - but I have not found it to be as beneficial as other frequencies. In short, if your goal is to raise your frequency (which it should be) then why would you listen to music in an even lower frequency than 440? That being said, look into music tuned to the solfeggio frequencies - especially 528hz (and any frequencies higher than that, but most re-tuned music will only be available in 528). I find it be much more beneficial than 432, and I recommend looking up the benefits of the 528 frequency if you want to know more about it. Of course, do what feels right to you, this is just my preference.
Have you looked into the “history” of 440 Hz tuning (and its connection with Third Reich)? My question is about tuning, not particular frequencies. (Actually, solfeggio frequencies are tuned to 432 Hz, which is correlated to their healing power.)
Here is some background information on music tuning and pitch:
Each note in the musical scale corresponds to a specific frequency. For example, in A440 tuning:
A4 = 440 Hz
B4 = 493.88 Hz
C5 = 523.25 Hz
And so on.
Alternative Tunings:
There are alternative tuning systems where the reference pitch for A4 is different. For instance, in A432 tuning:
A4 = 432 Hz
B4 = 484.90 Hz
C5 = 512.77 Hz
These frequencies are adjusted accordingly based on the reference pitch.
Changing the tuning standard alters the relative pitch relationships between notes. This can affect the overall tonality, harmony, and emotional feel of the music.
My question is: since mp3 users are likely affected by the background music in addition to any energy field embedded in it, what is the tuning method used in the background music?
Any input is appreciated!
The solfeggio frequencies do not contain 432hz, and they are not tuned to 432hz. Solfeggio scale and 432hz have no correlation other than the fact that both are associated with healing. Yes, I understood your question about the music tuning, Maitreya’s music is 440hz. All the music is from a royalty free music library, and in some cases I actually created the music myself. I do understand the alternate tuning systems as I have a degree in music theory and audio engineering. As for how tuning might affect the listener in a negative way, no it would not - the morphic field embedded in the audio “overrides” that, eliminating any negative effects and promoting only beneficial and healing effects. This is similar to how some “EMF blockers” work - they do not actually block or eliminate the electromagnetic frequencies (as energy cannot be destroyed) but they simply transmute it, to a more harmonized, beneficial frequency. So when using morphic fields, at least in this case, the tuning system used for the music within the field would not make a difference.
As for 528hz music that I mentioned before, yes there is music where the tuning is 528hz - I am not speaking about just the frequency. In this case, the tuning is A=444hz and C=528hz.
Thanks for your insights! In light of “mind over matter”, we can transmute any music or technology or energy with focus and will then.
What component of the music is the “energy field/structure” attached to? Music note? Scale? Waveform? Composition? Or something else? If the energy field works independently of music format, then we can convert these mp3 to another format, while preserving the energy field embedded in them?
Again I appreciate your opinion and insights!
Yes, I would say everyone has the ability to do that, but when it comes to actually creating morphic fields within an audio file that’s something that takes practice - Maitreya would be better with explaining how that works though, since that is not my field of expertise.
I believe when Maitreya creates fields within an audio, they are contained inside the audio file but they are independent of the music. I would say yes, you could convert the audio file to a different format and the field would still be contained, in most cases this works - but Maitreya would have to confirm that.
Thanks for your explanation. With the Field Emitter, I assume it emits both the (energy/vibration of) background music and the embedded energy field?
only the energy of the fields you use with it
Ok, with Emitter, only the energy field is emitted; when listening to audios, both the background music and the embedded energy field are broadcasted to the listener, correct?
How long does the energy field stay active? Indefinitely? This question is related to both audios and mandalas. Any clue or idea? (Assuming the audios and mandalas are obtained and used legitimately, of course.)
All fields work while they’re being used - an audio while listening, a DM while you’re carrying it with you (unless it’s one that needs to be activated which it will say in the description). With the audios, the field is being broadcasted - as mentioned previously, the field overrides any effects of the music. The music is just there for a nice listening experience and has no effects on it’s own.
Any further questions should be posted in the Questions thread, there are also many questions that have been answered already: Questions Thread
Thanks!!! You have answered all my questions.
P.S.: I thought I had understood everything, until I started to read the forum :).