# Why do the YouTube versions sometimes seem to work better than the boosted versions?

**URL:** <https://forum.maitreyafields.com/t/why-do-the-youtube-versions-sometimes-seem-to-work-better-than-the-boosted-versions/1902>\
**Category:** Audio Fields Stacks\
**Created:** [April 7, 2021, 9:35am UTC](https://forum.maitreyafields.com/t/why-do-the-youtube-versions-sometimes-seem-to-work-better-than-the-boosted-versions/1902 "2021-04-07T09:35:03Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 28

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![doughnuts4all](https://forum.maitreyafields.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/d/e19adc/32.png) [@doughnuts4all](https://forum.maitreyafields.com/u/doughnuts4all)\
**Post date:** [April 10, 2021, 3:18pm UTC](https://forum.maitreyafields.com/t/why-do-the-youtube-versions-sometimes-seem-to-work-better-than-the-boosted-versions/1902/28 "2021-04-10T15:18:22Z")

</div>

> [@Discussion for other similar channels on YouTube](https://forum.maitreyafields.com/t/discussion-for-other-similar-channels-on-youtube/84/545):
>
> That’s not how this works at all… The craze about files being encoded in WAV was a result of the subliminal community’s poor understanding of technology. Specifically, makers were creating ultrasonic subliminals (which do work), but some of those makers then decided to upload them to YouTube, which immediately broke them because YouTube’s encoding process’s compression automatically removes all inaudible ultrasonic frequencies. So, people needed a way to get these ultrasonic subliminals in a…

Read this

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.maitreyafields.com/t/why-do-the-youtube-versions-sometimes-seem-to-work-better-than-the-boosted-versions/1902)._