Brahmacharya God - NoFap Semen Retention and Transmutation [DM+Audio]

Fields For Men
89

Well, first of all before talking about techniques it’s important to understand the philosophy behind it. Brahmacarya means to be a celibate students, and the first thing that such students are taught is that they are not the body but the soul, and if your satisfaction is based on bodily stimulation then you are simply reinforcing the net of illusion.

Furthermore if you are satisfied at heart, what is the need to look for satisfaction in temporary stimulus? It is stated in the Bhagavad-Gita that such short-lived pleasures are not suitable for intelligent persons. I have lived in celibacy for a decade in an ashram, and I would encourage everyone addicted to or dependent on sex to be introspective, and ask themselves the question, why cannot I not be satisfied without it? If your belly is full, food naturally becomes less attactive.

What I mean by expressing love in different ways is based on the spiritual understanding that as parts of God our pleasure is interdependent with His, and by satisfying the Lord through noble work and actions (karma) with a heart full of love (bhakti) brings about the topmost satisfaction of the soul. The acts may vary but the key point is the selfless intention driving them. The favourite pastimes of me and my wife is to enlighten others in Vedic spiritual philosophy, to meditate on the sacred names of God and to cook the most delicious vegetarian preparations with love and distribute it liberally and indiscriminately to the children of God for His pleasure.

No I am not talking about tantra and astral sex. That is just a more subtle and sophisticated way of outliving the same animalistic propensity, but compared to the happiness of the soul in union with the Lord it pales into insignificance as a dinky little matchstick in the light of a supernova. If you want to know more I recommend you read the Bhagavad-Gita and the Srimad-Bhagavatam, the crest jewels of Vedic wisdom.

3 Likes
92

What if I told you that the concept of “karma”, as well as “serving the lord” are matrix traps?

Then I’ll be the guy poking Morpheus on the shoulder, letting him know that there are layers of illusion and enligthenment, and that he still have a lot of ground to be covered.

Please verify your statement with sound reason and logic. I don’t do blind faith, and “what if I told you” doesn’t hold much weight in turns of altering my paradigm, if it’s not backed up with evidence. I would debate your statement, and if what you say makes sense then I might consider it. As for now you are yet to impress me. It is always the nature of the part to serve the whole, as the cell serves the whole organism, as a screw has a function within the mechanism or the hand serves the body. As for karma, it’s one of the fundamental laws of physics that every action has an equal and opposite reaction. This is verified science. Though most only accept this in terms of material transaction, it holds true on levels not appreciable to the untrained eye.

the question is always how free and sovereign are you as a soul?

Again. Verify your statement. Why is this always the question? I don’t accept your premise.

According to my understanding freedom is always subservient to love which is a higher principle. Love is in actually surrender of freedom, as a mother voluntarily gives up her freedom for the sake of her child, and in that surrender in service she experience greater happiness than she could ever by being selfishly absorbed. Regarding sovereignty. Talk about illusion and matrix traps…

then why do you need this requirement of serving in the first place before you can be happy?

Since it is the nature of the soul. The souls natural element is an ever increasing expression of love, which is an emotion and experience, that naturally result in practical action - service in love. The soul needs service like a fish needs water.

The question is not if you will serve. You will, wether you like or not. But who, or what will you serve? Funny how some people serve their dog, faithfully picking up excrements, and the next moment they claim to independent gods. Most serve their physical needs, selfish aims and circumstantial relationships whereas the enlightened serve the Whole of which we are all part.

If you believe in Karma – then how can you actually be free?
Karma implies consequences. So you always have to “watch out for what you are doing/thinking/feeling” etc.
But true freedom can only exist if you can chose what the consequences will be and whether there will be consequences at all.

You know the french philosopher Jean-Jacques Rousseau? That was his idea. Ultimate freedom. The man, on the plea of expressing his freedom never took responsibility for his actions and fathered several children, whom he abandoned along with their destitute mothers in poverty.

I am personally not looking for freedom. I am looking for being bound with the ropes of love in a relationship, and to experience that love giving rise to true happiness in every action that is undertaking for the sake of the Beloved, which includes all souls as parts of the Whole.

There is also something that is called the “Law of Grace”, where you Higher Self can eliminate any consequences of any action

Sounds nice. But let’s have a practical demonstration of your philosophy in action. I challenge you to drink a liter of water and not pee for the next ten hours. Does your philosophy hold water? :wink:

And everything is possible because true freedom is what god/the sourse is.

God includes freedom, but God is so much more than that. Who are you to define and limit God?
Interesting discussion. I look forward to hearing your reflections.

Namaste.

2 Likes
93

:sweat_smile::joy::sweat_smile: really a very nice answer haha.you answered all the points correctly correctly lol, i’m almost impressed.of course, it goes without saying that the other was also very good at his argument.I always wanted believers to provide concrete and coherent explanations of their times, a kind of scientific demonstration lol. I have always believed that this was only possible in this type of forum where we can talk about everyone without taboos or judgment, but with the objective of growing in knowledge.

Without really wanting to get involved, I want to say some things.
First of all, in my opinion, the science of men is not perfect, not to say that it is not complete, it reinvents itself every day, progresses every year, and undergoes updates without stop.So this based on the mediocre science of the men of this world to explain the spiritual world is perhaps already a beginning of error.

What I mean is that you spoke of Newton’s third law to explain that it is normal that we receive proportionally what we give (for good and for bad / or over one life).But Newtonian physics is obsolete, because it does not allow to describe the whole universe, from where Einstein created relativistic physics (general relativity and special relativity). And even there, we are still at an incomplete science.But if we are satisfied with quantum physics which is much more advanced than Newtonian physics, you see and understand that the concepts of equivalent exchange do not exist and are completely wrong concepts.

in short, it is not a question here of making a statement of the properties and phenomena of subatomic particles, but rather of highlighting the fact that spirituality / the spiritual world is much more scientific than the science we know today.

Besides, do you know that there are machines capable of projecting a ray on you which makes you feel an immeasurable love, worthy of an unconditional love, but yet nothing is true.Is it just chemistry in your blood ?! programmed hormones or channeled neurons…

Besides, there is one thing that is a problem, which is that intelligence does not come from matter, I mean, where does intelligence come from, what created intelligence.

I think that the two parts have a share of truth, it remains for us to find the missing link in order to make a theory of unification that unites and explains the two approaches :upside_down_face::+1:

3 Likes
94

Thanks Takyon for your appreciative words. Please do get involved. :slight_smile:

Newtonian physics is obsolete, because it does not allow to describe the whole universe, from where Einstein created relativistic physics (general relativity and special relativity). And even there, we are still at an incomplete science.But if we are satisfied with quantum physics which is much more advanced than Newtonian physics, you see and understand that the concepts of equivalent exchange do not exist and are completely wrong concepts.

I almost agree with what you are saying. But if I may suggest a correction of the way you chose to phrase your statement - let me know if you agree. Newtonian physics are not giving the complete picture. But just because it does not describe the whole reality, that does not make it obsolete. Rejection of what you learn in first grade is not wrong, but it is incomplete, and it has it’s place upon which you build a progressively greater understanding.

I don’t see how you can disregard the equivalent exchange concept as being part of the quantum model. We have limited knowledge and understanding of all factors involved in the equation, and then how can we judge wether the response of an action in the quantum model is equivalent or disproportionate? What we can observe is that there is action and reaction both in Newtoniam physics and quantum, but they work in different ways, whereas Newtonian physics are more gross and the mechanisms of quantum reality are more subtle and unpredictable in nature.

I think that the two parts have a share of truth, it remains for us to find the missing link in order to make a theory of unification that unites and explains the two approaches

This! Reality is not Newtonian neither is it quantum. Both are integral parts in a complete reality. Total rejection of one model in favour of the other is absurd and narrow-minded, and the concept of karma applies perfectly in both, but in different ways, depending on what lens you observe the world through.

Besides, there is one thing that is a problem, which is that intelligence does not come from matter, I mean, where does intelligence come from, what created intelligence.

This to me is the best argument for the existence of a personal God. We cannot observe and grasp the completeness of the Unlimited with our limited instruments (senses, mind and intelligence). Just as you cannot measure the moisture in the air with a measuring tape. But what you can do is take a sample. We can understand something of the Unlimited by understanding the part.

The sun-ray gives heat and light, and we can naturally conclude therefore that the Sun must be warm and effulgent. Just as the drop of water is wet, it is axiomatic truth that the Ocean must also include this same nature. We as conscious living entities, with thoughts, emotions undergoing experience, and we are parts and parcels of a complete existence, and through investigation of our nature we can understand something of the Whole we are part of.

How can one then rationally conclude that the nature of the Complete is unconscious and impersonal? Sounds like either conscious fanaticism or unconscious ignorance to me.

@Maitreya

We are getting off on a tangent here. But it’s a nice discussion. Would it be possible to move it to a separate thread?

My question still stands in relation to field by the way. Can I listen to this and still conceive children?

95

Could someone tell what is time speed effect?

96

Think of it like the hyperbolic time chamber from DBZ. It’s just an effect of speeding up your perception of time.

97

Got it, thanks. Wish there was a field that gives Goku’s ripped body and his ultra fast movements!

98

How powerful is one listen to?

99

I am looking to reduce my sexual drive for masturbation and porn. How will this affect my sex life with women, will I still have a normal sexual desire? Will this stop all masturbation and porn, or just reduce the desire? Thank you for your time

100

Hey maitreya can brahma v1 and v2 be combined?

And the grounding and earthing file have something to circulate energy from top to bottom. Is that compatible with the automated microcosmic orbit in v1?
Dont know or v2 also have microcosmic in it.

101

You can safely use both. They will complement each other. V1 has different features.

102

Hello Maitreya
I am listening Brahmcharya V1 since 1 August (11 weeks+)
I got benefits like attraction from babies, a unique smell from my body & specially my narcissistic mom & grandmother,s rudeness faded upto some extent
Then i started Listening Brahmacharya V2 3-4 days ago
& All the benefits seems to be vanished
I thought benefits will multiply with both audios but looks like i was wrong
Why did this happend
What should i do now
Please guide :heart::heart:

1 Like
103

V2 is more advanced than V1, you might go through the phase of deep clearing now. Clearing always comes first.

1 Like
104

Would this be the field for recovering after nightfall? Energy wise as there is the feeling of sluggishness.

No addiction to fap or p*rn btw. Done neither in quite some time.

105

Yes, it will help with that and prevent it. If you don’t have some of the things mentioned in the description, it’s okay to use the field for other benefits. You might experience faster results.

2 Likes
106

@Polaris I have the version without speed from patreon. Maitreya said that the name should not be changed because the field was embedded there, is this the name it should have? “Brahmacarya God without time speed”.

1 Like
107

That is the original name of the file:

Brahmacarya God

1 Like
108

So should I change the name to get the version without speed? I remember downloading it from my PC and it will download with that name

109

I downloaded it with this name from Patreon to double-check. So, this is the original name.

2 Likes
110

This is the original name of the one that has no speed effect?
Strange, Patreon on PC always changes my names compared to on mobile, well, thanks. :smiley::folded_hands: